<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 972 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248045</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the CAT&#039;s decision that the appointment of Vice-Presidents of the ITAT was through promotion, not direct recruitment. It found no flaw in the selection process due to the failure to notify new pay scales after merging scales. The Court supported the Selection Committee&#039;s autonomy in determining selection procedures and emphasized that the absence of a comparative chart did not invalidate the process. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, suggesting the Central Government establish guidelines for future selections and recommending oversight by High Courts for quality assurance in ITAT orders and senior judicial appointments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 972 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248045</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the CAT&#039;s decision that the appointment of Vice-Presidents of the ITAT was through promotion, not direct recruitment. It found no flaw in the selection process due to the failure to notify new pay scales after merging scales. The Court supported the Selection Committee&#039;s autonomy in determining selection procedures and emphasized that the absence of a comparative chart did not invalidate the process. The Court dismissed the writ petitions, suggesting the Central Government establish guidelines for future selections and recommending oversight by High Courts for quality assurance in ITAT orders and senior judicial appointments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>