<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 953 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248026</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeals filed by the appellant due to the failure to provide a valid explanation for the delay in filing the appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles and taking due care and attention in complying with procedural requirements to ensure timely filing of appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 22:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 953 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248026</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeals filed by the appellant due to the failure to provide a valid explanation for the delay in filing the appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles and taking due care and attention in complying with procedural requirements to ensure timely filing of appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>