https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165223 An educational institution may fall within the Industrial Disputes Act's definition of "industry" where its activities satisfy the statutory test, so a school was treated as an industry for that purpose. A teacher employed in a school is not a "workman" under section 2(s) because teaching is neither manual, supervisory, technical nor clerical work; incidental clerical duties do not change that character. The statutory limitation in the definition of workman was given effect, and the refusal to direct a reference was sustained because the employee did not satisfy the definition, notwithstanding the institution's coverage under industrial law. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165223 An educational institution may fall within the Industrial Disputes Act's definition of "industry" where its activities satisfy the statutory test, so a school was treated as an industry for that purpose. A teacher employed in a school is not a "workman" under section 2(s) because teaching is neither manual, supervisory, technical nor clerical work; incidental clerical duties do not change that character. The statutory limitation in the definition of workman was given effect, and the refusal to direct a reference was sustained because the employee did not satisfy the definition, notwithstanding the institution's coverage under industrial law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165223