https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165219 The Supreme Court dismissed both writ petitions due to the absence of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami as a party, leading to non-maintainability. The court declined to reconsider the earlier decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability and found no merit in the alleged procedural illegalities by the Inquiry Committee. Emphasizing the importance of bona fide public interest litigation and limitations on locus standi, the decision upholds principles of judicial independence, procedural fairness, and the proper exercise of constitutional functions by high authorities like the Speaker of Lok Sabha. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165219 The Supreme Court dismissed both writ petitions due to the absence of Mr. Justice V. Ramaswami as a party, leading to non-maintainability. The court declined to reconsider the earlier decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability and found no merit in the alleged procedural illegalities by the Inquiry Committee. Emphasizing the importance of bona fide public interest litigation and limitations on locus standi, the decision upholds principles of judicial independence, procedural fairness, and the proper exercise of constitutional functions by high authorities like the Speaker of Lok Sabha. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165219