<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247984</link>
    <description>A contract for supply, erection and commissioning of machinery was treated as an inter-State sale where the contract was made by the head office, the goods were manufactured to specification, moved from outside Tamil Nadu pursuant to the supply contract, and were delivered in Tamil Nadu. The Court held that separate pricing, insurance arrangements and the post-delivery erection obligation did not change the character of the movement under the Central Sales Tax Act, and the accretion theory could not displace the statutory tests. As the transaction was an inter-State sale, local sales tax under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act could not be levied, and the related penalty under Section 3-B also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 911 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247984</link>
      <description>A contract for supply, erection and commissioning of machinery was treated as an inter-State sale where the contract was made by the head office, the goods were manufactured to specification, moved from outside Tamil Nadu pursuant to the supply contract, and were delivered in Tamil Nadu. The Court held that separate pricing, insurance arrangements and the post-delivery erection obligation did not change the character of the movement under the Central Sales Tax Act, and the accretion theory could not displace the statutory tests. As the transaction was an inter-State sale, local sales tax under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act could not be levied, and the related penalty under Section 3-B also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>