<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247970</link>
    <description>Disallowance of cost reimbursements and referral fees under transfer pricing was considered. The TPO must determine the ALP for intra-group cost reimbursements and benchmarking under Rule 10C is required because costs alone do not establish arm&#039;s length pricing; matter remitted to the TPO for ALP determination and back to the AO for assessment. Separately, the AO retains jurisdiction to test under the business purpose standard whether referral fees correspond to actual services; the HC set aside the ITAT finding that ousted AO scrutiny, remitted the referralfee issue to the AO for factual verification, and decided in favour of revenue on that point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247970</link>
      <description>Disallowance of cost reimbursements and referral fees under transfer pricing was considered. The TPO must determine the ALP for intra-group cost reimbursements and benchmarking under Rule 10C is required because costs alone do not establish arm&#039;s length pricing; matter remitted to the TPO for ALP determination and back to the AO for assessment. Separately, the AO retains jurisdiction to test under the business purpose standard whether referral fees correspond to actual services; the HC set aside the ITAT finding that ousted AO scrutiny, remitted the referralfee issue to the AO for factual verification, and decided in favour of revenue on that point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>