<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 887 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without new tangible material. The additions made by capitalizing the expenditure for developing new products were deleted, as the expenses were of a revenue nature and did not create any capital asset or provide enduring benefits in the capital field.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 08:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 887 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. The reopening of the assessment was deemed invalid as it was based on a change of opinion without new tangible material. The additions made by capitalizing the expenditure for developing new products were deleted, as the expenses were of a revenue nature and did not create any capital asset or provide enduring benefits in the capital field.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>