<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (1) TMI 34 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165216</link>
    <description>Section 296(2) of the Government of India Act, 1935 was treated as a transitional provision permitting a temporary appellate tribunal arrangement, not as a mandatory command requiring the Provincial Legislature to enact a tribunal law in any particular form. The Assam Revenue Tribunal (Transfer of Powers) Act, 1948 was upheld because it laid down a complete legislative scheme transferring appellate and revisional jurisdiction in a defined manner, so Section 3(3) did not amount to excessive delegation. The notification appointing the Commissioner of Hills Divisions and Appeals as appellate authority was also sustained as consistent with the later statutory scheme and not repugnant to Section 9 of the Eastern Bengal and Assam Excise Act, 1910.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (1) TMI 34 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165216</link>
      <description>Section 296(2) of the Government of India Act, 1935 was treated as a transitional provision permitting a temporary appellate tribunal arrangement, not as a mandatory command requiring the Provincial Legislature to enact a tribunal law in any particular form. The Assam Revenue Tribunal (Transfer of Powers) Act, 1948 was upheld because it laid down a complete legislative scheme transferring appellate and revisional jurisdiction in a defined manner, so Section 3(3) did not amount to excessive delegation. The notification appointing the Commissioner of Hills Divisions and Appeals as appellate authority was also sustained as consistent with the later statutory scheme and not repugnant to Section 9 of the Eastern Bengal and Assam Excise Act, 1910.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>