<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 874 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247947</link>
    <description>Persistent non-compliance with the procedural requirement to serve the revision and file an affidavit of service justified rejection of the Revenue&#039;s revision, because the rules allowed delayed filing only for sufficient reason and no affidavit was filed for years after institution. The appellate order was also left undisturbed because no material error of fact or law was shown in the findings recorded by the appellate authority. On both procedural and substantive grounds, the revision failed and the assessee&#039;s partial relief remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 874 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247947</link>
      <description>Persistent non-compliance with the procedural requirement to serve the revision and file an affidavit of service justified rejection of the Revenue&#039;s revision, because the rules allowed delayed filing only for sufficient reason and no affidavit was filed for years after institution. The appellate order was also left undisturbed because no material error of fact or law was shown in the findings recorded by the appellate authority. On both procedural and substantive grounds, the revision failed and the assessee&#039;s partial relief remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>