<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 873 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247946</link>
    <description>Receipt of additional sales tax as reimbursement from the Electricity Board was treated as collection of prohibited additional tax under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, so liability under Section 3-A was attracted; however, the statutory ceiling made the penalty discretionary, and the amount was reduced to 20% in view of bona fide belief and the transaction&#039;s circumstances. Penalty for alleged escaped turnover was unsustainable because there was no affirmative finding of wilful non-disclosure of assessable turnover, and the provision invoked was inapplicable. The penalty on that issue was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 873 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247946</link>
      <description>Receipt of additional sales tax as reimbursement from the Electricity Board was treated as collection of prohibited additional tax under the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act, so liability under Section 3-A was attracted; however, the statutory ceiling made the penalty discretionary, and the amount was reduced to 20% in view of bona fide belief and the transaction&#039;s circumstances. Penalty for alleged escaped turnover was unsustainable because there was no affirmative finding of wilful non-disclosure of assessable turnover, and the provision invoked was inapplicable. The penalty on that issue was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>