<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 867 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247940</link>
    <description>The applicant sought a waiver of a penalty under the Customs Act, contending he was not the importer but a commission agent. The Tribunal considered judicial consistency, noting the applicant&#039;s central role in customs duty evasion. The Member (Technical) emphasized the need to safeguard revenue interests, leading to a majority decision directing the applicant to pre-deposit Rs. 15 lakhs within eight weeks. Compliance would result in waiving the balance amount pre-deposit requirement and staying recovery during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 867 - CESTAT MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247940</link>
      <description>The applicant sought a waiver of a penalty under the Customs Act, contending he was not the importer but a commission agent. The Tribunal considered judicial consistency, noting the applicant&#039;s central role in customs duty evasion. The Member (Technical) emphasized the need to safeguard revenue interests, leading to a majority decision directing the applicant to pre-deposit Rs. 15 lakhs within eight weeks. Compliance would result in waiving the balance amount pre-deposit requirement and staying recovery during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>