<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 862 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247935</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the selection of Ms. Suman Devi as Inspector, Central Excise under the sports quota, emphasizing the importance of sports proficiency in the selection process. The Court rejected the challenge to her selection, emphasizing that the department&#039;s criteria, which prioritized sports achievements, were valid. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation, which focused solely on written tests and interviews, was deemed flawed and contrary to the recruitment scheme outlined in the circulars. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and affirmed the legality of Ms. Suman Devi&#039;s appointment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 862 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247935</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the selection of Ms. Suman Devi as Inspector, Central Excise under the sports quota, emphasizing the importance of sports proficiency in the selection process. The Court rejected the challenge to her selection, emphasizing that the department&#039;s criteria, which prioritized sports achievements, were valid. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation, which focused solely on written tests and interviews, was deemed flawed and contrary to the recruitment scheme outlined in the circulars. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment and affirmed the legality of Ms. Suman Devi&#039;s appointment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>