<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TRO Considers APIIC Consent Revocation as &quot;Force Majeure,&quot; Affecting EMGF Debt Owed to EHTPL in Dues Recovery Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18691</link>
    <description>Recovery of dues from third person - group company – TRO’s own observations, that the consequence of APIIC revoking consent could very well be considered “force majeure”, thus resulting in the EMGF debt continuing to be owed to EHTPL, is consistent with this line of reasoning - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 15:06:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 15:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TRO Considers APIIC Consent Revocation as &quot;Force Majeure,&quot; Affecting EMGF Debt Owed to EHTPL in Dues Recovery Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18691</link>
      <description>Recovery of dues from third person - group company – TRO’s own observations, that the consequence of APIIC revoking consent could very well be considered “force majeure”, thus resulting in the EMGF debt continuing to be owed to EHTPL, is consistent with this line of reasoning - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 15:06:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>