<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 846 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247919</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs.1,00,000 under section 68 of the Act was invalid as no fresh cash credit was identified in the relevant year, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The court emphasized that the amount in question was related to a previous year and did not warrant classification as unexplained cash credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 10:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 846 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247919</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs.1,00,000 under section 68 of the Act was invalid as no fresh cash credit was identified in the relevant year, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The court emphasized that the amount in question was related to a previous year and did not warrant classification as unexplained cash credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>