<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 844 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee followed KYC norms and maintained systematic records, and that the society was excluded from the purview of section 68 of the Act for member deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the deletion of the addition under S.68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 844 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessee followed KYC norms and maintained systematic records, and that the society was excluded from the purview of section 68 of the Act for member deposits. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the deletion of the addition under S.68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>