<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling that registration for claiming a refund under CENVAT Credit Rules was not mandatory for units exporting services, particularly when tax liabilities were exempted. The Tribunal emphasized that refund under Rule 5 could not be denied for services received before registration, especially when the department did not contest service receipt, tax payment, or service export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, ruling that registration for claiming a refund under CENVAT Credit Rules was not mandatory for units exporting services, particularly when tax liabilities were exempted. The Tribunal emphasized that refund under Rule 5 could not be denied for services received before registration, especially when the department did not contest service receipt, tax payment, or service export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>