https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247898 The court held that the approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation cannot be solely through postal ballot and electronic voting, emphasizing the necessity of actual meetings for shareholder participation, discourse, and informed decision-making. It clarified that while electronic methods enhance shareholder rights, they cannot replace physical meetings. The judgment underscored the importance of transparency, inclusiveness, and the fundamental right to ask questions, rejecting the idea that electronic voting and postal ballots alone suffice for corporate decision-making. The court called for a balanced approach, incorporating electronic methods alongside physical meetings for effective corporate governance. en-us Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 May 2014 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247898 The court held that the approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation cannot be solely through postal ballot and electronic voting, emphasizing the necessity of actual meetings for shareholder participation, discourse, and informed decision-making. It clarified that while electronic methods enhance shareholder rights, they cannot replace physical meetings. The judgment underscored the importance of transparency, inclusiveness, and the fundamental right to ask questions, rejecting the idea that electronic voting and postal ballots alone suffice for corporate decision-making. The court called for a balanced approach, incorporating electronic methods alongside physical meetings for effective corporate governance. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247898