<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 823 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247896</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a significant delay of 481 days in filing, despite the petitioner&#039;s explanation attributing the delay to internal file movements. The court emphasized that government departments must adhere to the law of limitation and provide valid justifications for delays, as condonation of delay should not be routine. Citing a previous case with similar circumstances, where delay was not condoned, the court held that the appeal must be dismissed on the grounds of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 823 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247896</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a significant delay of 481 days in filing, despite the petitioner&#039;s explanation attributing the delay to internal file movements. The court emphasized that government departments must adhere to the law of limitation and provide valid justifications for delays, as condonation of delay should not be routine. Citing a previous case with similar circumstances, where delay was not condoned, the court held that the appeal must be dismissed on the grounds of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>