<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Test of unjust enrichment not satisfied where refund amount is shown as ‘expenditure’ and not as ‘claims receivable’</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5632</link>
    <description>Whether a refund meets the unjust enrichment test turns on procedural compliance for payment under protest, timeliness measured from the operative appellate order, and the claimant&#039;s accounting treatment; if the amount is recorded as expenditure rather than as a claims receivable, it indicates the duty was borne and the unjust enrichment test is not satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 13:17:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 13:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Test of unjust enrichment not satisfied where refund amount is shown as ‘expenditure’ and not as ‘claims receivable’</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5632</link>
      <description>Whether a refund meets the unjust enrichment test turns on procedural compliance for payment under protest, timeliness measured from the operative appellate order, and the claimant&#039;s accounting treatment; if the amount is recorded as expenditure rather than as a claims receivable, it indicates the duty was borne and the unjust enrichment test is not satisfied.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 13:17:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>