https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165207 A scheme under Chapter IVA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 creating exclusive or partial operation on notified routes for a State transport undertaking was treated as valid legislative action within the concurrent field relating to monopolies and State business. The discrimination challenge failed because overlapping routes alone did not show that the affected operators were similarly situated or legally entitled to ply on the notified routes. Allegations of bias against the approving authority also failed in the absence of reliable proof of personal bias. The objections were found to have been heard and considered in the manner required by law, so the approval of the scheme was upheld and the petition dismissed. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165207 A scheme under Chapter IVA of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 creating exclusive or partial operation on notified routes for a State transport undertaking was treated as valid legislative action within the concurrent field relating to monopolies and State business. The discrimination challenge failed because overlapping routes alone did not show that the affected operators were similarly situated or legally entitled to ply on the notified routes. Allegations of bias against the approving authority also failed in the absence of reliable proof of personal bias. The objections were found to have been heard and considered in the manner required by law, so the approval of the scheme was upheld and the petition dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Apr 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165207