<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 817 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the sales promotion expenses incurred were genuine, necessary, and wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 3,32,77,529/-, emphasizing that the expenses were justified and crucial for the assessee&#039;s business growth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 817 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the sales promotion expenses incurred were genuine, necessary, and wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 3,32,77,529/-, emphasizing that the expenses were justified and crucial for the assessee&#039;s business growth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>