<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 809 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247882</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance for non-deduction of TDS under sec. 194C(1). The Tribunal found that individual payments did not exceed the specified thresholds, making the appellant not liable to deduct TDS as per the provisions of the Act. The judgment affirmed that sec. 40(a)(ia) was inapplicable in this case, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 10:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 809 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247882</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance for non-deduction of TDS under sec. 194C(1). The Tribunal found that individual payments did not exceed the specified thresholds, making the appellant not liable to deduct TDS as per the provisions of the Act. The judgment affirmed that sec. 40(a)(ia) was inapplicable in this case, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>