<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 807 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247880</link>
    <description>Broken period interest paid on purchase of securities was treated as allowable revenue expenditure, following the assessee&#039;s own prior-year decision, and the disallowance was deleted. Depreciation on leased assets was also allowed on the settled principle that a genuine lessor may be regarded as owner for section 32 purposes when the assets are used in business. However, where the Rajendra Steels disallowance rested solely on a search statement, the Tribunal required cross-examination of the adverse material and remitted that limited issue for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 807 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247880</link>
      <description>Broken period interest paid on purchase of securities was treated as allowable revenue expenditure, following the assessee&#039;s own prior-year decision, and the disallowance was deleted. Depreciation on leased assets was also allowed on the settled principle that a genuine lessor may be regarded as owner for section 32 purposes when the assets are used in business. However, where the Rajendra Steels disallowance rested solely on a search statement, the Tribunal required cross-examination of the adverse material and remitted that limited issue for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>