<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 793 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247866</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for Condonation of Delay, appeal, and stay application due to unsatisfactory reasons provided for the delay. The appellant&#039;s explanations, including one party being on a business tour, were deemed invalid as a firm cannot undertake such activities. Consequently, both the Condonation of Delay and stay application were rejected alongside the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 13:37:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 793 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247866</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for Condonation of Delay, appeal, and stay application due to unsatisfactory reasons provided for the delay. The appellant&#039;s explanations, including one party being on a business tour, were deemed invalid as a firm cannot undertake such activities. Consequently, both the Condonation of Delay and stay application were rejected alongside the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>