<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 790 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247863</link>
    <description>Capital goods received before 1-4-2000 but installed thereafter qualified only for the credit available under the transitional Cenvat rule, namely 50% in the relevant financial year; the balance could not be carried forward to later years. Because the assessee took credit beyond that limit in two stages, the excess credit was inadmissible. As the credit availment itself was irregular, the consequential levy of interest and penalty was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 13:35:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 790 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247863</link>
      <description>Capital goods received before 1-4-2000 but installed thereafter qualified only for the credit available under the transitional Cenvat rule, namely 50% in the relevant financial year; the balance could not be carried forward to later years. Because the assessee took credit beyond that limit in two stages, the excess credit was inadmissible. As the credit availment itself was irregular, the consequential levy of interest and penalty was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>