<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 786 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to classify an imported consignment as waste and scrap, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The case involved conflicting valuation reports on the consignment&#039;s nature, emphasizing factual inspection over presumptions. The Tribunal highlighted the mandatory acceptance of the price paid for goods under Customs Valuation Rules, dismissing the rejection of transaction value as unjustified. Legal precedents supported classifying serviceable but unusable goods as scrap, leading to the consignment&#039;s classification as waste and scrap.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 12:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 786 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to classify an imported consignment as waste and scrap, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The case involved conflicting valuation reports on the consignment&#039;s nature, emphasizing factual inspection over presumptions. The Tribunal highlighted the mandatory acceptance of the price paid for goods under Customs Valuation Rules, dismissing the rejection of transaction value as unjustified. Legal precedents supported classifying serviceable but unusable goods as scrap, leading to the consignment&#039;s classification as waste and scrap.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>