https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165204 The Supreme Court held that under the amended Article 311 of the Constitution and Rule 15(4) of the Central Civil Services Rules, a second opportunity for representation against the penalty was not necessary. The respondent, a government servant facing dismissal for misconduct, was found to have been adequately informed of the charges and given a fair chance to be heard. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, remanding the case for a merit-based review while emphasizing that the initial opportunity for representation sufficed. The dismissal decision was upheld, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165204 The Supreme Court held that under the amended Article 311 of the Constitution and Rule 15(4) of the Central Civil Services Rules, a second opportunity for representation against the penalty was not necessary. The respondent, a government servant facing dismissal for misconduct, was found to have been adequately informed of the charges and given a fair chance to be heard. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, remanding the case for a merit-based review while emphasizing that the initial opportunity for representation sufficed. The dismissal decision was upheld, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165204