<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 340 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165204</link>
    <description>After the Forty-Second Amendment, Article 311(2) and the amended service rules no longer require a second opportunity to show cause against the proposed penalty once the charged employee has received notice of the allegations and a reasonable hearing in the inquiry. The disciplinary authority may impose the appropriate penalty on the basis of the inquiry findings without issuing a further notice on punishment. The inquiry report supplied after the order does not revive any right to a second show-cause notice. The dismissal could not be set aside for want of that further opportunity, and the matter was remitted for decision on the remaining merits of the disciplinary appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 340 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165204</link>
      <description>After the Forty-Second Amendment, Article 311(2) and the amended service rules no longer require a second opportunity to show cause against the proposed penalty once the charged employee has received notice of the allegations and a reasonable hearing in the inquiry. The disciplinary authority may impose the appropriate penalty on the basis of the inquiry findings without issuing a further notice on punishment. The inquiry report supplied after the order does not revive any right to a second show-cause notice. The dismissal could not be set aside for want of that further opportunity, and the matter was remitted for decision on the remaining merits of the disciplinary appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>