https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165203 A propounder of a will must prove due execution and attestation and, where suspicious circumstances are raised, satisfactorily remove them. The Supreme Court applied that rule and accepted that the holograph will was in the testator's handwriting, that the testator had full testamentary capacity, and that no real suspicious circumstances existed. It also relied on the document's intrinsic features to support the stated execution date and accepted the attesting witnesses' testimony. The handwriting expert's opinion was found inconclusive and insufficient to outweigh direct evidence. The will was therefore held duly executed and attested, and probate was warranted. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165203 A propounder of a will must prove due execution and attestation and, where suspicious circumstances are raised, satisfactorily remove them. The Supreme Court applied that rule and accepted that the holograph will was in the testator's handwriting, that the testator had full testamentary capacity, and that no real suspicious circumstances existed. It also relied on the document's intrinsic features to support the stated execution date and accepted the attesting witnesses' testimony. The handwriting expert's opinion was found inconclusive and insufficient to outweigh direct evidence. The will was therefore held duly executed and attested, and probate was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Sep 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165203