<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 756 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247829</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on a stay application filed by the main appellant and others regarding penalties imposed for shortages of MS Wire, lead ingots, and non-receipt of imported Zinc ingots. The appellant argued shortages were sent to job workers and imported Zinc ingots were used in manufacturing, while Revenue cited admissions by appellant&#039;s employees. The court acknowledged the appellant&#039;s prima facie case on MS Wire shortages but questioned the lead ingots shortage. It ordered a specific pre-deposit, stayed recoveries and penalties, pending final hearing for detailed scrutiny of demands against the appellant, balancing interests of both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 756 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247829</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on a stay application filed by the main appellant and others regarding penalties imposed for shortages of MS Wire, lead ingots, and non-receipt of imported Zinc ingots. The appellant argued shortages were sent to job workers and imported Zinc ingots were used in manufacturing, while Revenue cited admissions by appellant&#039;s employees. The court acknowledged the appellant&#039;s prima facie case on MS Wire shortages but questioned the lead ingots shortage. It ordered a specific pre-deposit, stayed recoveries and penalties, pending final hearing for detailed scrutiny of demands against the appellant, balancing interests of both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>