<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 754 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247827</link>
    <description>Activated bentonite clay was held classifiable under Heading 3802 before 1-2-2003 and from 1-1-2007 onwards because Chapter Note 1, the HSN Explanatory Notes and the Board circular treated activated clay as outside Chapter 25; however, it fell under specific sub-heading 2508 10 90 from 1-2-2003 to 31-12-2006 when that tariff entry expressly covered activated bentonite. On limitation, the extended period was unavailable absent suppression or misdeclaration, and a mere wrong claim of classification did not by itself justify extended demand; time-barred demands and related confiscation, fine and penalty were set aside, subject to demands within limitation or arising from provisional assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 754 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247827</link>
      <description>Activated bentonite clay was held classifiable under Heading 3802 before 1-2-2003 and from 1-1-2007 onwards because Chapter Note 1, the HSN Explanatory Notes and the Board circular treated activated clay as outside Chapter 25; however, it fell under specific sub-heading 2508 10 90 from 1-2-2003 to 31-12-2006 when that tariff entry expressly covered activated bentonite. On limitation, the extended period was unavailable absent suppression or misdeclaration, and a mere wrong claim of classification did not by itself justify extended demand; time-barred demands and related confiscation, fine and penalty were set aside, subject to demands within limitation or arising from provisional assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>