<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 752 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247825</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals of importers and CHAs accused of undervaluation and misdeclaration of goods due to lack of bill of entry and declaration in the IGM. The tribunal found the charges unsustainable as no bill of entry was filed by the appellants, and their names were not referenced in the IGM. Penalties were waived, and the impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the necessity of proper documentation in import transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 11:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 752 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247825</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals of importers and CHAs accused of undervaluation and misdeclaration of goods due to lack of bill of entry and declaration in the IGM. The tribunal found the charges unsustainable as no bill of entry was filed by the appellants, and their names were not referenced in the IGM. Penalties were waived, and the impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the necessity of proper documentation in import transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>