<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 749 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247822</link>
    <description>Where the core company dispute is already pending before the primary forum, connected criminal and appellate proceedings may be treated as unnecessary to continue and the parties may be left to pursue the main petition first. The Court directed expedited disposal of the company petition by the Company Law Board within six months, declined to enforce either rival interim order, and required the parties to maintain status quo in the meantime. Liberty was preserved to seek appropriate interim relief from the Company Law Board if exigency arose. The matter was thus managed procedurally, with the substantive dispute left for decision by the primary forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 11:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 749 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247822</link>
      <description>Where the core company dispute is already pending before the primary forum, connected criminal and appellate proceedings may be treated as unnecessary to continue and the parties may be left to pursue the main petition first. The Court directed expedited disposal of the company petition by the Company Law Board within six months, declined to enforce either rival interim order, and required the parties to maintain status quo in the meantime. Liberty was preserved to seek appropriate interim relief from the Company Law Board if exigency arose. The matter was thus managed procedurally, with the substantive dispute left for decision by the primary forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>