<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (10) TMI 56 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165200</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court&#039;s order, stating that the High Court erred in directing the Governor to reconsider the punishment. The Court affirmed that the findings of the Tribunal on specific charges were sufficient to uphold the dismissal, emphasizing that the penalty imposed by the competent authority was not subject to judicial review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (10) TMI 56 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165200</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court&#039;s order, stating that the High Court erred in directing the Governor to reconsider the punishment. The Court affirmed that the findings of the Tribunal on specific charges were sufficient to uphold the dismissal, emphasizing that the penalty imposed by the competent authority was not subject to judicial review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>