https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165199 The Court set aside the petitioner's conviction under Section 193 IPC due to procedural irregularities in not following the requirements of Sections 195 and 340 Cr.P.C. The conviction and sentence for contempt of Court under Article 129 of the Constitution were upheld. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of procedural requirements and clarified its limited powers under Article 142 of the Constitution. The petitioner agreed not to seek compensation or challenge the conviction under Section 193 IPC. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165199 The Court set aside the petitioner's conviction under Section 193 IPC due to procedural irregularities in not following the requirements of Sections 195 and 340 Cr.P.C. The conviction and sentence for contempt of Court under Article 129 of the Constitution were upheld. The Court emphasized the mandatory nature of procedural requirements and clarified its limited powers under Article 142 of the Constitution. The petitioner agreed not to seek compensation or challenge the conviction under Section 193 IPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165199