<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Misclassifying Transactions as Exports to Claim Section 10B Tax Exemptions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18637</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10B - it would not be open to the assessee to claim that transactions, which are not exports in a strict sense of the term and in which the assessee does not receive foreign exchange remittance, be treated as such - penalty was justified - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 11:53:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 11:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Misclassifying Transactions as Exports to Claim Section 10B Tax Exemptions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18637</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10B - it would not be open to the assessee to claim that transactions, which are not exports in a strict sense of the term and in which the assessee does not receive foreign exchange remittance, be treated as such - penalty was justified - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 11:53:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>