<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 725 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247798</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on housekeeping, rent-a-cab, outdoor catering, design and advertising services was treated as prima facie admissible for stay purposes because housekeeping was linked to the statutory requirement of keeping the factory clean for manufacturing operations, rent-a-cab was supported by precedent, and outdoor catering for workers&#039; canteen together with design and advertising services was regarded as falling within the settled scope of input service. On that basis, a strong prima facie case was found and waiver of pre-deposit was granted, with recovery of the disputed demand, interest and penalty stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 09:00:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 725 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247798</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on housekeeping, rent-a-cab, outdoor catering, design and advertising services was treated as prima facie admissible for stay purposes because housekeeping was linked to the statutory requirement of keeping the factory clean for manufacturing operations, rent-a-cab was supported by precedent, and outdoor catering for workers&#039; canteen together with design and advertising services was regarded as falling within the settled scope of input service. On that basis, a strong prima facie case was found and waiver of pre-deposit was granted, with recovery of the disputed demand, interest and penalty stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>