<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247782</link>
    <description>The High Court examined the interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme under the Income-tax Act, 1961, focusing on penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(a). It found the Tribunal&#039;s inconsistency in decisions for the same assessment year to be erroneous. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the voluntary nature of the surrender and the need for consistency in penalty assessments. Ultimately, the Court allowed the appeal, highlighting the importance of adherence to legal principles in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 08:42:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 709 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247782</link>
      <description>The High Court examined the interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme under the Income-tax Act, 1961, focusing on penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(a). It found the Tribunal&#039;s inconsistency in decisions for the same assessment year to be erroneous. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the voluntary nature of the surrender and the need for consistency in penalty assessments. Ultimately, the Court allowed the appeal, highlighting the importance of adherence to legal principles in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>