https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247763 The Court upheld the demand under 'Information Technology and Software service' and 'Sponsorship service', ordering payment of Rs.1,27,193/- and Rs.15,450/- respectively. Additionally, a reversal of proportionate CENVAT credit under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules amounting to Rs.1,73,045/- was mandated. Despite the Appellants' excess payment of Rs.1,03,529/-, their appeal was rejected on incorrect grounds of presenting additional evidence. The Court noted unconsidered grounds and remanded the case for fresh consideration, setting aside the impugned order to ensure a fair opportunity for the Appellants to present their case. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 May 2014 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247763 The Court upheld the demand under 'Information Technology and Software service' and 'Sponsorship service', ordering payment of Rs.1,27,193/- and Rs.15,450/- respectively. Additionally, a reversal of proportionate CENVAT credit under Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules amounting to Rs.1,73,045/- was mandated. Despite the Appellants' excess payment of Rs.1,03,529/-, their appeal was rejected on incorrect grounds of presenting additional evidence. The Court noted unconsidered grounds and remanded the case for fresh consideration, setting aside the impugned order to ensure a fair opportunity for the Appellants to present their case. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247763