<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 689 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent, M/s. Kesar Petro Products Ltd. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the respondent as a Del Credre Agent did not qualify as Market Research Agency services for Service Tax liability. Despite the agreement mentioning market surveys, the respondent primarily acted as a Del Credre Agent, receiving commissions for their services. The Tribunal found no grounds to reclassify the services, aligning with the precedent established by a High Court decision. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was also rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 21:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 689 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent, M/s. Kesar Petro Products Ltd. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the respondent as a Del Credre Agent did not qualify as Market Research Agency services for Service Tax liability. Despite the agreement mentioning market surveys, the respondent primarily acted as a Del Credre Agent, receiving commissions for their services. The Tribunal found no grounds to reclassify the services, aligning with the precedent established by a High Court decision. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was also rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>