https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247760 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for various services received by the respondent, emphasizing the need for services to be directly related to the output service provided. Penalties for wrong availment of credit were upheld, while penalties related to Section 76 were set aside. The case underscores the significance of accurately assessing Cenvat credit eligibility based on the connection between services utilized and the output service offered. en-us Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 May 2014 20:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247760 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for various services received by the respondent, emphasizing the need for services to be directly related to the output service provided. Penalties for wrong availment of credit were upheld, while penalties related to Section 76 were set aside. The case underscores the significance of accurately assessing Cenvat credit eligibility based on the connection between services utilized and the output service offered. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247760