<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 686 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247759</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act for items not included in the Registration Certificate. The penalty was reduced to 50% for the purchase of aluminium sheets alone, considering the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and the essential nature of the items for business activities. The Court emphasized the importance of a genuine belief in including items in the Registration Certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 686 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247759</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act for items not included in the Registration Certificate. The penalty was reduced to 50% for the purchase of aluminium sheets alone, considering the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and the essential nature of the items for business activities. The Court emphasized the importance of a genuine belief in including items in the Registration Certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>