<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 681 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247754</link>
    <description>Section 35F of the Central Excise Act permits an appeal against duty or penalty only on deposit of the amount demanded, subject to waiver where deposit would cause undue hardship and conditions are needed to protect Revenue. Undue hardship requires assessment of both a prima facie case and financial hardship. Here, no financial hardship was pleaded or proved before the Tribunal or the Court, while the Tribunal considered the appellants&#039; arguable points and still ordered only a limited pre-deposit. The Court held that the conditions imposed were not onerous and that the Tribunal had properly exercised its statutory discretion, so the direction for partial pre-deposit was upheld and complete waiver was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 20:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 681 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247754</link>
      <description>Section 35F of the Central Excise Act permits an appeal against duty or penalty only on deposit of the amount demanded, subject to waiver where deposit would cause undue hardship and conditions are needed to protect Revenue. Undue hardship requires assessment of both a prima facie case and financial hardship. Here, no financial hardship was pleaded or proved before the Tribunal or the Court, while the Tribunal considered the appellants&#039; arguable points and still ordered only a limited pre-deposit. The Court held that the conditions imposed were not onerous and that the Tribunal had properly exercised its statutory discretion, so the direction for partial pre-deposit was upheld and complete waiver was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>