<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 676 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the valuation of imported goods, holding that the transaction value should be accepted unless proven incorrect with substantial evidence. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% of the value of the goods, respectively, following precedents and emphasizing judicial discipline. Despite a dissenting opinion, the Tribunal upheld the reduction in fines and penalties, allowing the appellant to redeem the goods upon payment of the revised amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 19:45:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 676 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the valuation of imported goods, holding that the transaction value should be accepted unless proven incorrect with substantial evidence. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty to 10% and 5% of the value of the goods, respectively, following precedents and emphasizing judicial discipline. Despite a dissenting opinion, the Tribunal upheld the reduction in fines and penalties, allowing the appellant to redeem the goods upon payment of the revised amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>