<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 675 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking interest on the refund of redemption fine and penalty, as the applicant failed to specify the rule under which interest was claimed. The adjudicating authority was found to have correctly implemented the Tribunal&#039;s order without interest payment, leading to the rejection of the applicant&#039;s request for interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 675 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking interest on the refund of redemption fine and penalty, as the applicant failed to specify the rule under which interest was claimed. The adjudicating authority was found to have correctly implemented the Tribunal&#039;s order without interest payment, leading to the rejection of the applicant&#039;s request for interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>