<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 674 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as lacking merit, upholding the consistent classification of the imported goods under CTH 8418 10 90 and the denial of the benefit under Notification No. 85/2004. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous judgments, emphasizing the correct classification and denial of the benefit in line with the appellant&#039;s own case precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 19:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 674 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as lacking merit, upholding the consistent classification of the imported goods under CTH 8418 10 90 and the denial of the benefit under Notification No. 85/2004. The decision was based on established legal principles and previous judgments, emphasizing the correct classification and denial of the benefit in line with the appellant&#039;s own case precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>