https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165197 The Court ruled that undue delay in executing a death sentence allows the condemned person to seek relief under Article 32. The decision in a previous case establishing a two-year rule for commutation was overturned, emphasizing that no fixed period automatically warrants commutation. The Court highlighted the importance of considering the nature of the delay and circumstances post-final verdict in determining the fate of the death sentence. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165197 The Court ruled that undue delay in executing a death sentence allows the condemned person to seek relief under Article 32. The decision in a previous case establishing a two-year rule for commutation was overturned, emphasizing that no fixed period automatically warrants commutation. The Court highlighted the importance of considering the nature of the delay and circumstances post-final verdict in determining the fate of the death sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165197