<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165196</link>
    <description>Article 31-A was interpreted as protecting not only direct agrarian redistribution but also ancillary measures within a bona fide scheme of consolidation of holdings and rural planning. The protected scope was said to extend to reservation and transfer of shamlat deh and abadi deh lands for common village purposes such as Panchayat use, schools, hospitals, manure pits, cremation grounds, and abadi extension. Measures that modified or extinguished proprietary rights in land assigned for those purposes were treated as valid, and transfer of such land to the Panchayat or other beneficiaries was not considered unconstitutional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 68 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165196</link>
      <description>Article 31-A was interpreted as protecting not only direct agrarian redistribution but also ancillary measures within a bona fide scheme of consolidation of holdings and rural planning. The protected scope was said to extend to reservation and transfer of shamlat deh and abadi deh lands for common village purposes such as Panchayat use, schools, hospitals, manure pits, cremation grounds, and abadi extension. Measures that modified or extinguished proprietary rights in land assigned for those purposes were treated as valid, and transfer of such land to the Panchayat or other beneficiaries was not considered unconstitutional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>