<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 664 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, concluding that there was no concealment or filing of inaccurate particulars of income. The penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for administrative expenses, write-off of unsaleable stock, and unpaid expenses were deleted. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty imposition is not automatic for every disallowance and highlighted the good faith and transparency of the assessee&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 11:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 664 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, concluding that there was no concealment or filing of inaccurate particulars of income. The penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for administrative expenses, write-off of unsaleable stock, and unpaid expenses were deleted. The Tribunal emphasized that penalty imposition is not automatic for every disallowance and highlighted the good faith and transparency of the assessee&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>