<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 662 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247735</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay application filed by the assessee-firm, directing the matter to be restored to the file of CIT-16 for a speaking and reasoned order within one month, affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The demand arising from the penalty order of the FAA was stayed for a month or until CIT-16&#039;s decision, whichever is earlier, emphasizing the importance of well-reasoned orders in such matters and compliance with legal guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 662 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247735</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay application filed by the assessee-firm, directing the matter to be restored to the file of CIT-16 for a speaking and reasoned order within one month, affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The demand arising from the penalty order of the FAA was stayed for a month or until CIT-16&#039;s decision, whichever is earlier, emphasizing the importance of well-reasoned orders in such matters and compliance with legal guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>