<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 657 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the Rs.15,18,000 addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of unproved painting purchases by the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of deduction claimed by the assessee for the painting purchase, the payment made by cheque, and the absence of trading in paintings by the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 11:17:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 657 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the Rs.15,18,000 addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of unproved painting purchases by the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of deduction claimed by the assessee for the painting purchase, the payment made by cheque, and the absence of trading in paintings by the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>